Estimating the Prevalence of Sexual Assault on College Campuses

Friday 31 January 2025


Sexual assault is a pervasive and devastating problem that affects millions of people around the world. In the United States, the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) has been conducting annual surveys to measure the prevalence of sexual assault since 1995. However, there has been growing concern about the accuracy of these estimates due to underreporting.


Researchers have long known that many victims of sexual assault do not report their experiences to the authorities or participate in surveys. This can lead to a significant underestimate of the true incidence of sexual assault. To address this issue, scientists have developed statistical models that account for underreporting and adjust the estimates accordingly.


Recently, a team of researchers published a study on the prevalence of sexual assault on college campuses in the US. They used a Bayesian model to estimate the number of assaults that occurred between 2014 and 2019. The model took into account various factors such as student population size, gender imbalance, and whether a school offers religious instruction.


The results showed that there were significantly more assaults than previously reported. In fact, the estimated number of assaults was nearly double what was reported in the NCVS data. This suggests that underreporting is a major issue, and that many victims are not coming forward to report their experiences.


One of the key findings of the study was that schools with larger student populations had higher rates of sexual assault. This could be due to a number of factors, including increased social interactions and partying culture on campus. The study also found that schools with a higher proportion of female students had lower rates of sexual assault.


The researchers used a hierarchical model to account for underreporting. They assumed that the true number of assaults was normally distributed around a mean value, and that the reporting probability was also normally distributed. By using this model, they were able to estimate the total number of assaults and the reporting rate.


The study’s findings have important implications for policymakers and campus administrators. Firstly, it highlights the need for more comprehensive data on sexual assault prevalence. This could involve conducting more frequent surveys or using alternative methods to measure underreporting. Secondly, it suggests that schools may need to implement additional measures to prevent sexual assault, such as increased education and awareness campaigns.


The study’s authors also explored the sensitivity of their results to different prior specifications. They found that changes in the prior distributions had a significant impact on the estimated number of assaults and reporting rate. This highlights the importance of using robust methods for estimating underreporting.


Cite this article: “Estimating the Prevalence of Sexual Assault on College Campuses”, The Science Archive, 2025.


Sexual Assault, Prevalence, Underreporting, College Campuses, Us, Bayesian Model, Hierarchical Model, Normal Distribution, Reporting Rate, Data Collection.


Reference: Casey Bradshaw, David M. Blei, “A Bayesian Model of Underreporting for Sexual Assault on College Campuses” (2024).


Leave a Reply